Previous Entry | Next Entry

Oct. 19th, 2007

  • 4:13 PM
pepper: Pepperpot (Green Wing job)
I wish I could use the phrase "It's not what you said, it's how you said it," without it sounding like a complete cliche. Either that, or I need to remember the training I went on about high- and low-context people, and how to cope with them - because the emails I've been getting today from The Annoying Man In Facilities are just so... GRAH. Perhaps he can't express himself very well - but "Do you want me to do it then?" just comes across as hostile to me. Maybe I'm reading into it. 

High-context and low-context, in case you're wondering, is about how people talk. High-context people, when asked a question, will give you the answer, and all the surrounding reasons, plus the history of the building, what they had for breakfast this morning, and how their mother's operation went. Low-context people will give you the exact answer to what you asked - nothing more. Both can be difficult to deal with - sometimes you just want a simple "yes" or "no", and not all the reasons for that decision, because you just want to get the email sent and go home, please. And sometimes you need to know a little more than "yes" or "no", and having to drag every bit of information can be like pulling teeth.

It helped me deal with certain people at my previous work - one woman in particular would only give a direct, brusque answer, and I used to find her incredibly rude. But I learnt to see it as just the way she talks, and I could deal with it without taking it personally. (She was, actually, kind of rude, but I think some of that was in response to how other people reacted to her - she probably lived in a world of bad attitudes, and didn't realise she was bringing a lot of that upon herself.)

I started out with a point... Oh, yes: written communication is just as bad, if not worse, as most people aren't trained to express themselves emotionally through their writing. People on LJ are pretty good, but I think that's because it's pretty writing-centric. But people day-to-day don't necessarily know how their writing makes them appear.

I still think this guy is being rude to me, though.

---

See y'all later for the AIM [profile] redial_the_gateHathor rewatch, eh?

Tags:

Comments

nandamai: (Default)
[personal profile] nandamai wrote:
Oct. 19th, 2007 07:45 pm (UTC)
Daniel Jackson is the high-contextest high-context person ever.
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 19th, 2007 07:52 pm (UTC)
Oh god yes... witness WoO:

Hammond: "So the loop can be broken?"

Daniel: "Err... There's a section of text on the altar that deals specifically with the geomagnetic storms that power the device. Apparently they recur every fifty or so years - which is why, incidentally..."

Jack: "YES, sir. The loop can be broken."
nandamai: (Default)
[personal profile] nandamai wrote:
Oct. 19th, 2007 08:15 pm (UTC)
Sam does it, too, but Sam doesn't try again after she's been cut off.

Poor Daniel. And he can't even get it out of his system by presenting or publishing in academia! Awww.

Actually, I read a story recently that was set in a later season, 7 I think, and had Daniel rambling on and on in a combat situation, and it really bugged me. Daniel's smart enough not to do that, now.

Latest Month

November 2023
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Page Summary

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars