Previous Entry | Next Entry

Jan. 3rd, 2009

  • 5:41 PM
pepper: Pepperpot (Geek chic)
Doctor Who: the only series to have a whole programme on the main channel, at prime-time, dedicated to introducing the new actor playing the main character. Boy did they drag out the announcement that the new Doctor will be... Matt Smith.

...who? (Hah.) *checks IMDb* I wish I'd watched Ruby In The Smoke like I'd intended to do, because now I'll be conscious that this guy is going to be the Doctor.

Apparently Doctor Who is also All About The Hair. Dear god, the Doctor is five years younger than me. That feels rather unpleasantly landmark.

I'll miss David Tennant. :( But I'm looking forward to see what Stephen Moffat and Matt Smith do with the series. And I want to watch the Ark In Space again. And the whole of the Peter Davison era. And damn, I wish there'd been more Paul McGann, I must get some more of the audio dramas.

So that's... interesting.


Comments

aelfgyfu_mead: Aelfgyfu as a South Park-style cartoon (Default)
[personal profile] aelfgyfu_mead wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 06:22 pm (UTC)
He's only five years younger than you? I have a few more years on him.

I've never heard of him, but then, I think the only Doctor I'd ever heard of before he was cast was Peter Davison--and I'm not even sure of that, because I was watching All Creatures Great and Small and DW on PBS and CBC at about the same time, so I might have known him as the Doctor first.
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 06:57 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I'm pleased that he's a relative unknown (he's been in a couple of things, but I don't think they were very big). But he's... awfully young...
aelfgyfu_mead: Aelfgyfu as a South Park-style cartoon (Default)
[personal profile] aelfgyfu_mead wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 06:59 pm (UTC)
I realized after my first rash of posts that I have seen him. I can't say he stood out, but he was not a major character, and it was a pretty poor script, I thought: Shadow in the North, with Billie Piper as Sally Lockhart.

They just keep getting younger all the time, don't they? Actors, students.... sigh
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:07 pm (UTC)
By the time they reach the Thirteenth Doctor, he'll be a foetus. *g*

I keep meaning to watch those - I've read one of the books. Hopefully they'll replay them, now he's Doctor-to-be, and I can get some idea of what he's like.
[identity profile] sg1danny.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 06:32 pm (UTC)
My initial reaction was...WTF?! I've never heard of him and dear god he's incredibly young. Makes me feel OLD. He's over 20 years young than meeeeeee.

And yes, Dr Who is now All About The Hair, Emo anyone??
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:03 pm (UTC)
OMG, yes, that's very emo hair. My first reaction was, "Huh?" - I didn't realise he was the Doctor for a long moment.

Well, maybe by spring 2010, he'll be... still very young. Eh.
rydra_wong: Lee Miller photo showing two women wearing metal fire masks in England during WWII. (Default)
[personal profile] rydra_wong wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:06 pm (UTC)
I swear, at this rate, the twelfth doctor will be a gangly emo fetus.

(I was hoping for Paterson Joseph, I admit.)
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:09 pm (UTC)
Aha! Snap. *g*

Paterson Joseph has just the right RADA-style for the role. I'm not surprised they didn't choose him, though.
rydra_wong: Lee Miller photo showing two women wearing metal fire masks in England during WWII. (Default)
[personal profile] rydra_wong wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:17 pm (UTC)
Snap.

Great minds think alike! *g*
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:28 pm (UTC)
I was thinking that they ought to have the younger-and-younger progression as part of the show - of course, they'd have to explain Sylvester McCoy, but I'm sure there's a decent handwave out there for that. The idea that he gets younger as he gets older is, well, irritating in one way, but it kind of works in another.
[identity profile] naelany.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 06:47 pm (UTC)
O.o Jimmeny, why the new Doc?
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:04 pm (UTC)
Well, David Tennant couldn't stick around forever. Much though I wish he could. Waaaaah! The new guy doesn't start until spring 2010, though.
[identity profile] naelany.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:16 pm (UTC)
true... though it seems like he only just started... and some of the other Doctors were there for... well, a long time! *sigh* I shouldn't be bothered by it... since I can't see the series anyway lol
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:27 pm (UTC)
since I can't see the series anyway lol

Heh! Well, yes, that ought to make it easier for you...! :D
[identity profile] naelany.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:31 pm (UTC)
lol just a little ^_~
[identity profile] crazedturkey.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:08 pm (UTC)
I'm excited. Stephen Moffat wrote my favourite episodes of Dr. Who.

Also Press Gang.

Therefore he is a GOD.

(I'm afraid that I am one of those fans who loves my show unreasonably. Yes he is young and a bit daffy, but you know what...I still think it'll be Dr. Who and FUNN!!)
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:12 pm (UTC)
Ah, I LOVE Stephen Moffat - I'm very, very excited about him being the new writer / lead producer. I'm reserving judgement, because they've had major, unexpected changes before, and carried it off with panache - so it could be fine.

*is still dubious about the guy's age and funny hair, though*
[identity profile] rihansu.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:16 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure how I feel about this. I saw him in the Ruby in the Smoke and the Shadow in the North, but all I remember about him was his character had this really put on Cockney accent. And he's so young. (And on related note, looking way ahead to the post-Daniel Craig era - I think I may have a breakdown if the next Bond turns out to be younger than me.)

On the other hand the cast changes on Doctor Who have always worked for me. I thought I'd never get used to Ten or Martha or Donna, but I always ended up loving them.

I've been meaning to start watching the older Doctor Who episodes since Netflix has them available to watch for free.
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:26 pm (UTC)
Oh gods, a Bond younger than me would give me a shock. Someday it'll happen. Argh.

And, true - in recent Doctor / companion changes, they've all been good (although I still wish they'd kept Martha around).

I'm feeling slightly... maliciously pleased? Because this is the sixth change of Doctor I've seen, and the third time it's slightly broken my heart - and I feel that the new fans are probably starting to really understand just what this series periodically does to viewers. :7
[identity profile] rihansu.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 09:14 pm (UTC)
I really wished for more Martha, I was a bit disappointed in The Sontaran Stratagem and The Poison Sky since a lot of the time she was actually not!Martha. And I really wanted to see a lot more Martha and Donna interaction, I think that would have been really fun for them and us. :)
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 10:21 pm (UTC)
It didn't bother me so much, somehow - I know it was not!Martha, but I felt like I got to see a lot of Martha, even though I didn't. *shrug* I'm apparently easily pleased with substitutes. :)

But yes - Martha and Donna were fun together. I liked that they made them allies, and not rivals. Heh.
[identity profile] caladria.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 07:46 pm (UTC)
So MUCH hair! it's not what he did with it, it's that it was all on one side, and all you could see was a nose sticking out!

(Although, ha! He's still four years older than me!)

Ruby in the Smoke was good - I mean, I liked him. He didn't stick out too much (which, I guess, is kind of the point of acting) - I was busy focusing on the difference to the books a lot.

But, we'll see. I'm not overly enthusiastic, but I'm unreasonably filled with David Tennant is GOING woe. Because... he IS the first Doctor I've seen new episodes for oer a long period of time, really (and Ten had more glee than Nine). And I'm unreasonably attached to Doctor and Donna combo. But.. I trust the Moffat. I'm really glad it is him taking over, even if Piers Wenger just looked hungover and red around the eyes...
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 09:20 pm (UTC)
Although, ha! He's still four years older than me!

Hee - you wait. Someday there'll be a Doctor younger than you, and you'll feel like you've crossed some invisible barrier. *g*

And yeah, that's mostly the problem I'm having. I'm not averse to a new Doctor - I just don't want David Tennant to GO! *clings*
[identity profile] caladria.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 09:48 pm (UTC)
Well they've only got two more goes, right? Twelve regenerations makes 13 Doctors. (He doesn't look any younger than me, really, though. I bet he still gets ID'd, and that's a weird thought for a Doctor.)

And... it's not just Ten I'll miss - it genuinely is David Tennant, and his geeky fanboy-ism and his love of all Who. Because that's not just been fun to watch, it really has been great for the show (From the whole five minutes of footage, I get the feeling that Matt Smith is a bit like me, and grew up in the Gap Of No Who; there was only the film between me being two and me being eighteen).
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 10:16 pm (UTC)
Well they've only got two more goes, right? Twelve regenerations makes 13 Doctors.

Oh, but you can bet that, if the series is still going strong, they'll find a way around it. They've already got the Master as a canon example. I was talking to someone about it earlier, though, and we wondered if, by then, the series will be waning in popularity - and if so, whether they'd choose to end it then. They'd have the opportunity to do something spectacular.

Still, even if they do end it after 13, I would still bet it'd come back again, a few years (or decades) down the line. Barring the collapse of western civilization.

Yeah, I see what you mean about David Tennant. He's always so gleeful about Who, when he's interviewed - it's so adorable to see someone who genuinely cares about the show, and geeky about the history. When they did that snippet with Peter Davison, I found that so moving, because he was my Doctor, too, and David Tennant was kind of saying that for me, and for everyone else whose first Doctor was PD. I guess David Tennant has established himself enough for new fans to have the same feeling, when he goes. (I just don't think Christopher Eccleston was around long enough to do that - at least, not on a grand scale.)
[identity profile] caladria.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 3rd, 2009 10:37 pm (UTC)
The Doctor - canonly - now has a daughter floating around out there... just sayin'.

Or maybe they'll do a "every Time Lord except the Doctor because he's special and the last one".

Time Crash? It was less a mini-adventure and more a love-letter from Tennant and Moffat to Davison and classic Who, and that was brilliant by me.

I think you're right about Chris Ecclestone - he was good, and I worried about whether his replacement was going to be as good, but he wasn't so firmly embedded in my head (Tennant's going to end up being my Doctor, methinks). When you said "Doctor Who" to me, I still thought of Tom Baker, because my Who knowledge was random episodes on a Saturday afternoon on BBC2.

Chris Ecclestone was.. respectful, but he didn't love it like Tennant seems to, who kind of gave kids the idea that it was okay to love the show that much, because he does, too (it's kind of what I love about the entire Who production team - a lot of the writers were fans, first; including James Moran who apparently turned up to his Torchwood readthrough wearing a Dalek T-shirt to give them a hint. But hey, it worked, he got Pompeii).
dhae_knight_1: My kitten Zasha (Default)
[personal profile] dhae_knight_1 wrote:
Jan. 4th, 2009 02:57 pm (UTC)
OMG. 1982? When did the Doctor get transplanted with Merlin, who aged backwards? Next up: Doctor Who - teenage angst? o.O

Man, I feel old now, and I really think 32 is a little early for that... :-/
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 18th, 2009 10:35 pm (UTC)
Hee - yes, 32 is FAR too young to feel old. *g*

The Doctor = Merlin... have they done that? They must have done that sometime.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 18th, 2009 10:10 am (UTC)
Don't Hate
Why such a problem with him? Yes, he's young. Yes, he likes his hair. Ever thought about the fact that Doctor Who's target audience these days are kids between the ages of 9 and 19? I think he's fine.
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Jan. 18th, 2009 10:34 pm (UTC)
Re: Don't Hate
I don't hate him, or have a huge problem with him, and I'm not sure how you've inferred that from what I posted. I said that I'm reserving judgement until I see the show, and look forward to see what they do – that there's potential in the idea that the Doctor gets progressively younger.

Doctor Who began as a series aimed at children. I don't believe that means that all the adults watching can't also hold an opinion about it, or love it just as much.

Latest Month

November 2023
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars