Previous Entry | Next Entry

Won't somebody think of the kittens?

  • Dec. 1st, 2008 at 7:57 PM
pepper: Pepperpot (Ellipsis)
Is it just me, or is there something darn stupid about the current news story about John Barrowman: "The BBC was back apologising today after Doctor Who actor John Barrowman exposed himself on a live Radio 1 show." Really? Live on radio, eh? Shocking. Daily Mail readers should go after the makers of I'm Sorry I'll Read That Again, next - I hear they transmitted a regular half-hour of "full-frontal radio" throughout the 1960s. These people must be stopped!!!

ETA: Aha - it was also recorded on webcam. Okay, that makes more sense.

*waits for YouTube to explode*

Comments

[identity profile] naelany.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 08:47 pm (UTC)
O.o Excuse me? He "exposed himself"... on the radio??? And the BBC is publicly apologizing for that why? I mean, sure, apologize to the staff and assorted people actually, you know... there. But who the heck cares!
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:01 pm (UTC)
Well, seeing as the presenter of the show was the one who suggested he do it, I don't think he needs apologising to... Eh, it's all just media stupidity.
[identity profile] naelany.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 10:10 pm (UTC)
*eyeroll* stupidity sounds like the right word for it
ext_2131: picture of a fish with lots of green (Default)
[identity profile] holdouttrout.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 08:51 pm (UTC)
*blinks*

And they say Americans are prudes...actually, we probably would have had him fired. Never mind. *g*
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:04 pm (UTC)
Heh.

Well, there's been a spate of media fuss about bad behaviour on radio shows, recently - blown up ridiculously by the press. Normally, I suspect it would have gone by without notice. I mean, exposing himself on radio, ffs.
dhae_knight_1: My kitten Zasha (Default)
[personal profile] dhae_knight_1 wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:04 pm (UTC)
Uh... how the heck do you expose yourself on radio?

Also? By inviting John Barrowman, wasn't that something they should have seen coming? I mean, that's like inviting a politician and expect him to not talk about politics, isn't it?
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:06 pm (UTC)
It's a very good question. Lurid descriptions, perhaps? *g*

Well, the presenter of the show apparently said this to John Barrowman: "You’re famous, we’re told, for getting your willy out in interviews. Is this going to happen today?"

So, a) it's happened before, and nobody's taken much notice, and b) they rather invited it.

*shrugs*
dhae_knight_1: My kitten Zasha (Default)
[personal profile] dhae_knight_1 wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:29 pm (UTC)
And... what, people are supposed to be less offended by the presenter, than by Barrowman? I think I'd be more offended by the presenter getting that close and personal (okay, maybe not so much in this instance - I think Barrowman is eminently capable of defending himself). *shakes head sadly*

Bizarro-world - here I come!
[identity profile] suzannemarie.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:04 pm (UTC)
Now, is the apology for the nudity or because listeners don't get to see it?
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:07 pm (UTC)
Hee! Now that actually might make sense.
dhae_knight_1: My kitten Zasha (Default)
[personal profile] dhae_knight_1 wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:26 pm (UTC)
Oh, now that sounds like something they should be doing... ;-)
rydra_wong: Lee Miller photo showing two women wearing metal fire masks in England during WWII. (Default)
[personal profile] rydra_wong wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:13 pm (UTC)
ETA: Aha - it was also recorded on webcam. Okay, that makes more sense.

The Beeb saith:

A spokeswoman also stressed that nothing untoward was screened online via the station's webcam.

Nope, still not making any sense.
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:34 pm (UTC)
Ah, good. My faith in the idiocy of this story is restored. :)

I like Charlie Brooker's suggestion:

Or maybe, just maybe, it's time to establish "Counter-Complaints": a method of registering your complaint about the number of knee-jerk complaints. And one should cancel out the other - so if 25,000 people complain, and a further 25,000 counter-complain, the total number of complaints is zero. It might lead to a lot of fruitless button-mashing, but at least we can keep our shared national culture relatively sane.
[identity profile] a-loquita.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 10:13 pm (UTC)
Bwhahaha! This is hilarious and should go down in the books along with the "wardrobe malfunction" and that time the new anchor had a "breakdown" on air.

*shakes head*
ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 10:21 pm (UTC)
It's ridiculous, isn't it? Maybe it's a joke! *checks date* No, not April 1st. Huh.
[identity profile] sg1danny.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 10:48 pm (UTC)
Oh for the love of....!!! I swear the BBC are still in the throws of a nervous break down. Any little thing is setting them off!

ext_3314: Woman writing (Default)
[identity profile] pepper-field.livejournal.com wrote:
Dec. 1st, 2008 10:57 pm (UTC)
Yeah, they're a tiny bit jittery, aren't they? Eesh.

Latest Month

November 2023
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars